Thesauros Edebiyat Felsefe τὰ Μετὰ τὰ Φυσικά

τὰ Μετὰ τὰ Φυσικά

τὰ Μετὰ τὰ Φυσικά Aristotle

Kitap 4

1 There are some, however, as we have said, who both state themselves that the same thing can be and not be, and say that it is possible to hold this view. Many even of the physicists adopt this theory. But we have just assumed that it is impossible at once to be and not to be, and by this means we have proved that this is the most certain of all principles.
2 Some, indeed, demand to have the law proved, but this is because they lack educationsc., in logic.; for it shows lack of education not to know of what we should require proof, and of what we should not. For it is quite impossible that everything should have a proof; the process would go on to infinity, so that even so there would be no proof.Every proof is based upon some hypothesis, to prove which another hypothesis must be assumed, and so on ad infinitum.
3 If on the other hand there are some things of which no proof need be sought, they cannot say what principle they think to be more self-evident. Even in the case of this law, however, we can demonstrate the impossibility by refutation, if only our opponent makes some statement. If he makes none, it is absurd to seek for an argument against one who has no arguments of his own about anything, in so far as he has none; for such a person, in so far as he is such, is really no better than a vegetable.

Agora Sokakları

Üyelik

Dil ve Tema

Dil Seçimi
TR EN
Tema Seçimi