Φίληβος

Bölümler

11 11–12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16–17 17 17–18 18 18–19 19 19 20 20–21 21 22 22–23 23 23–24 24 24–25 25–26 26 26–27 27 27–28 28 29 29–30 30 30–31 31 32 32–33 33 33–34 34 34–35 35 36 36–37 37 37–38 38 38–39 39–40 40 40–41 41 42 42–43 43 43–44 44–45 45 45–46 46 46–47 47–48 48 48–49 49 49–50 50–51 51 51 52 52–53 53 53–54 54–55 55 55–56 56–57 57 57–58 58 59 59–60 60 60–61 61 62 62–63 63 64 64–65 65 65–66 66–67 67

İngilizce Yunanca

15

Socrates

Soc. I mean, my boy, when a person postulates unity which is not the unity of one of the things which come into being and perish, as in the examples we had just now. For in cases of a unity of that sort, as I just said, it is agreed that refutation is needless. But when the assertion is made that man is one, or ox is one, or beauty is one, or the good is one, the intense interest in these and similar unities becomes disagreement and controversy.

Protarchus

Pro. How is that?

Socrates

Soc. The first question is whether we should believe that such unities really exist; the second, how these unities, each of which is one, always the same, and admitting neither generation nor destruction, can nevertheless be permanently this one unity; and the third, how in the infinite number of things which come into being this unity, whether we are to assume that it is dispersed and has become many, or that it is entirely separated from itself—which would seem to be the most impossible notion of all being the same and one, is to be at the same time in one and in many. These are the questions, Protarchus, about this kind of one and many, not those others, which cause the utmost perplexity, if ill solved, and are, if well solved, of the greatest assistance.

Protarchus

Pro. Then is it now, Socrates, our first duty to thresh this matter out?

Socrates

Soc. Yes, that is what I should say. 5