Σοφιστής

Bölümler

216 216–217 217 217–218 218–219 219 219–220 220 220–221 221 221–222 222 222–223 223 224 224–225 225 225–226 226 226–227 227 227–228 228 228–229 229–230 230 230 230–231 231 232 232–233 233 233–234 234 234–235 235 236 236–237 237 237–238 238 238–239 239–240 240 240–241 241 241–242 242 243 243 243–244 244 244–245 245 245–246 246 246–247 247 247–248 248 248–249 249 249–250 250 250–251 251 251–252 252 252 253 253–254 254 254 255 255–256 256 256–257 257 257 258 258 259 259 259–260 260 260–261 261 261–262 262 262–263 263 263–264 264 264–265 265 266 266 266–267 267 267–268 268

İngilizce Yunanca

252

Stranger

Str. See how by this admission everything is overturned at once, as it seems—the doctrine of those who advocate universal motion, that of the partisans of unity and rest, and that of the men who teach that all existing things are distributed into invariable and everlasting kinds. For all of these make use of being as an attribute. One party says that the universe is in motion, another that it is at rest.

Theaetetus

Theaet. Exactly. 5

Stranger

Str. And further, all who teach that things combine at one time and separate at another, whether infinite elements combine in unity and are derived from unity or finite elements separate and then unite, regardless of whether they say that these changes take place successively or without interruption, would be talking nonsense in all these doctrines, if there is no intermingling.

Theaetetus

Theaet. Quite right.

Stranger

Str. Then, too, the very men who forbid us to call anything by another name because it participates in the effect produced by another, would be made most especially ridiculous by this doctrine.

Theaetetus

Theaet. How so?