Thesauros › Edebiyat › Hitabet › Pro A. Cluentio

Pro A. Cluentio

←
Pro A. Cluentio Cicero, Marcus Tullius
İngilizce LAT
Bölümler
– 1 – 2 3 – 3 4 – 4 5 – 5 6 – 6 7 – 7 8 – 8 9 – 9 10 – 10 11 – 11 12 – 12 13 – 13 14 – 14 15 – 16 17 – 17 18 – 18 19 – 20 21 – 21 22 – 22 23 – 24 25 – 25 26 – 27 28 – 28 29 – 29 30 – 30 31 – 31 32 – 33 34 – 35 36 – 36 37 – 37 38 – 38 39 – 39 40 – 40 41 – 41 42 – 42 43 – 43 44 – 45 46 – 46 47 – 47 48 – 48 49 – 49 50 – 50 51 – 51 52 – 52 53 – 53 54 – 54 55 – 55 56 – 56 57 – 57 58 – 58 59 – 59 60 – 60 61 – 61 62 – 62 63 – 63 64 – 64 65 – 65 66 – 66 67 – 67 68 – 68 69 – 69 70 – 70 71 – 71 72 – 72 73 – 73 74 – 74 75 – 75 76 – 76 77 – 77 78 – 78 79 – 79 80 – 80 81 – 81 82 – 82 83 – 83 84 – 84 85 – 86 87 – 87 88 – 88 89 – 89 90 – 90 91 – 91 92 – 92 93 – 93 94 – 94 95 – 95 96 – 96 97 – 97 98 – 98 99 – 100 101 – 101 102 – 102 103 – 103 104 – 104 105 – 105 106 – 106 107 – 107 108 – 108 109 – 109 110 – 110 111 – 111 112 – 112 113 – 113 114 – 114 115 – 115 116 – 116 117 – 117 118 – 118 119 – 119 120 – 120 121 – 121 122 – 122 123 – 123 124 – 124 125 – 125 126 – 126 127 – 127 128 – 128 129 – 129 130 – 130 131 – 131 132 – 132 133 – 133 134 – 134 135 – 135 136 – 136 137 – 137 138 – 138 139 – 139 140 – 140 141 – 141 142 – 142 143 – 143 144 – 144 145 – 145 146 – 146 147 – 147 148 – 148 149 – 149 150 – 150 151 – 151 152 – 152 153 – 153 154 – 154 155 – 155 156 – 156 157 – 157 158 – 158 159 – 159 160 – 160 161 – 161 162 – 162 163 – 163 164 – 164 165 – 166 167 – 167 168 – 168 169 – 169 170 – 170 171 – 171 172 – 173 174 – 174 175 – 175 176 – 176 177 – 177 178 – 178 179 – 179 180 – 180 181 – 181 182 – 182 183 – 183 184 – 184 185 – 185 186 – 186 187 – 187 188 – 188 189 – 189 190 – 190 191 – 191 192 – 192 193 – 194 195 – 195 196 – 196 197 – 197 198 – 198 199 – 199 200 – 200 201 – 201 202 – 202
İngilizce Latince
61 Then indeed those decisions of the senatorial body, branded with no imaginary odium, but with real and conspicuous infamy, covered with disgrace and ignominy, would have left no room for any defence of them. For what answer could these judges make if any one asked of them, “You have condemned Scamander; of what crime? Because, forsooth, he attempted to murder Habitus by poison, by the agency of the slave of the doctor. What was Scamander to gain by the death of Habitus? Nothing; but he was the agent of Oppianicus. You have condemned Caius Fabricius; why so? Because, as he himself was exceedingly intimate with Oppianicus, and as his freedman had been detected in the very act, it was not proved that he was entirely ignorant of his design.” If, then, they had acquitted Oppianicus himself, after he had been twice condemned by their own decisions, who could have endured such infamy on the part of the tribunals, such inconsistency in judicial decisions, and such caprice on the part of the judges?
← Önceki 54 / 190 Sonraki →

Agora Sokakları

Symposion Agora CAT Silenos Khaire Kerameikos Yayınlar Angelos Keryks Skolia Sepet Docs

Üyelik

Dil ve Tema

Dil Seçimi
TR EN
Tema Seçimi