Κατὰ Δημοσθένους

Bölümler

1 – 2 3 – 4 5 – 5 6 – 6 7 – 8 9 – 9 10 – 10 11 – 12 13 – 13 14 – 14 15 – 17 17 – 18 19 – 21 22 – 23 24 – 25 26 – 28 28 – 28 29 – 29 30 – 30 31 – 32 33 – 33 34 – 35 36 – 37 38 – 39 40 – 42 43 – 43 44 – 44 45 – 46 47 – 48 49 – 51 52 – 53 54 – 55 56 – 57 58 – 59 60 – 61 62 – 63 64 – 65 66 – 68 69 – 70 71 – 71 72 – 72 73 – 73 74 – 75 76 – 77 78 – 80 80 – 80 81 – 81 82 – 84 84 – 85 86 – 86 87 – 88 89 – 91 92 – 93 94 – 95 96 – 99 99 – 100 101 – 102 103 – 104 105 – 107 108 – 109 110 – 111 112 – 113 114 – 114

İngilizce Yunanca

58 In the case of Polyeuctus of Cydantidae,For Polyeuctus of Cydantidae, the accuser of Euxenippus, cf. Hyp. 4.4, Introduction. when the people instructed the council to inquire whether he was accompanying the exiles to Megara and to report back after the investigation, it reported that he was doing so. You chose accusers as the law prescribes: Polyeuctus came into court and you acquitted him, on his admitting that he was going to Megara to Nicophanes who, he said, was married to his mother. So you did not consider that he was doing anything strange or reprehensible in keeping in touch with his mother's husband who was in difficulties, or in assisting him, so far as he could, while he was banished from the country.

59 The report of the council, Demosthenes, was not proved false; it was quite true, but the jury decided to acquit Polyeuctus. The council was instructed to discover the truth, yet, as I say, the court decided whether it was a case for pardon. Is that any reason for distrusting the council over the present reports in which it has stated that you and your confederates are in possession of the gold? That would be disgraceful.

← Önceki 34 / 63 Sonraki →

Agora Sokakları

Symposion Agora CAT Silenos Khaire Kerameikos Yayınlar Angelos Keryks Skolia Sepet Docs

Üyelik

Dil ve Tema

Dil Seçimi

TR EN

Tema Seçimi

Şifre Yenileme