Συναγωγὴ ἱστοριῶν παραλλήλων Ἑλληνικῶν καὶ Ῥωμαϊκῶν

Bölümler

intro – intro intro – intro intro – 1 – 1 2 – 2 2 – 2 3 – 3 3 – 3 4 – 4 5 – 5 5 – 6 6 – 7 7 – 8 8 – 9 9 – 9 10 – 10 11 – 12 12 – 13 14 – 15 15 – 15 16 – 16 17 – 18 18 – 19 19 – 20 20 – 21 21 – 22 22 – 23 23 – 24 25 – 26 26 – 27 27 – 29 29 – 30 30 – 31 32 – 32 32 – 32 33 – 33 33 – 34 34 – 35 35 – 35 36 – 36 37 – 38 38 – 39 39 – 40 40 – 41 41 – 41

İngilizce İngilizce Yunanca Yunanca

intro Wilhelm Schmid (Philologische Wochenschrift 1932, coll. 625-634) has reviewed Schlereth’s work with great care. Both Schmid and Nachstädt hold that the citations from otherwise unknown authors are genuine, not falsifications of the compiler. Nachstädt, accordingly in the Teubner edition of 1934, gives all the references, and also adds, for convenient comparison, the most important passages from Stobaeus, Lydus, and a gnomologicum Parisinum, published by Sternbach in 1893, which seem to have the same original as the text of the present work.

The greater part of mankind think that tales of ancient events are inventions and myths because of the incredible elements which they contain. But since I have discovered that similar events have happened in this modern era, I have singled out crises of Roman history; and, to parallel each ancient happening, I have subjoined a more modern instance. I have also recorded my authorities.

← Önceki 3 / 45 Sonraki →

Agora Sokakları

Symposion Agora CAT Silenos Khaire Kerameikos Yayınlar Angelos Keryks Skolia Sepet Docs

Üyelik

Dil ve Tema

Dil Seçimi

TR EN

Tema Seçimi

Şifre Yenileme