Πῶς δεῖ Ἱστορίαν συγγράφειν

Sections

1 – 1 2 – 3 4 – 4 5 – 5 6 – 6 7 – 7 8 – 8 9 – 9 10 – 10 11 – 11 12 – 12 13 – 13 14 – 14 15 – 15 15 – 16 17 – 18 19 – 19 20 – 20 21 – 21 22 – 22 23 – 23 24 – 24 25 – 25 26 – 26 27 – 27 28 – 28 29 – 29 30 – 30 31 – 31 32 – 33 34 – 34 35 – 36 37 – 37 38 – 38 39 – 39 40 – 41 42 – 44 45 – 46 47 – 48 49 – 50 51 – 52 53 – 54 55 – 56 57 – 58 59 – 61 62 – 63

İngilizce İngilizce Yunanca Yunanca

24 However, any mistake in mere expression or arrangement is excusable; but when you come to fancy geography, differing from the other not by miles or leagues, but by whole days’ journeys, where is the classical model for that? One writer has taken so little trouble with his facts—never met a Syrian, I suppose, nor listened to the stray information you may pick up at the barber’s—, that he thus locates Europus:—‘Europus lies in Mesopotamia, two days’ journey from the Euphrates, and is a colony from Edessa.’ Not content with that, this enterprising person has in the same book taken up my native Samosata and shifted it, citadel, walls, and all, into Mesopotamia, giving it the two rivers for boundaries, and making them shave past it, all but touching the walls on either side. I suspect you would laugh at me, Philo, if I were to set about convincing you that I am neither Parthian nor Mesopotamian, as this whimsical colony-planter makes me.