Ἀποκηρυττόμενος

Sections

– 1 2 – 2 3 – 3 4 – 4 5 – 5 6 – 6 7 – 7 8 – 8 9 – 9 10 – 10 11 – 11 12 – 12 13 – 13 14 – 14 15 – 15 16 – 16 17 – 17 18 – 18 19 – 19 20 – 20 21 – 21 22 – 22 23 – 23 24 – 24 25 – 25 26 – 26 27 – 27 28 – 28 29 – 29 30 – 30 31 – 31 32 – 32

İngilizce İngilizce Yunanca

12 Suppose I were not your begotten, but only your adopted son, I hold that you could not then have disinherited me; for what it is originally open to us not to do, we have no right, having done, to undo, But where there is both the natural tie, and that of deliberate choice, how can a second rejection, a repeated deprivation of the one relationship, be justified? Or again, suppose I had been a slave, and you had seen reason to put me in irons, and afterwards, convinced of my innocence, made me a free man; could you, upon an angry impulse, have enslaved me again? Assuredly not; the law makes these acts binding and irrevocable. Upon this contention, that the voluntary annulment of a disinheritance precludes a repetition of the act, I could enlarge further, but will not labour the point.