Περὶ τῆς Συρίης Θεοῦ

Sections

1 – 1 2 – 3 4 – 4 5 – 5 6 – 6 7 – 7 8 – 8 9 – 9 10 – 11 12 – 12 12 – 12 13 – 13 13 – 13 14 – 14 15 – 15 15 – 15 16 – 16 17 – 17 17 – 17 18 – 18 19 – 19 20 – 20 21 – 22 22 – 22 23 – 23 24 – 24 25 – 25 26 – 26 26 – 26 27 – 27 27 – 27 28 – 28 29 – 29 29 – 29 29 – 30 31 – 31 31 – 31 32 – 32 33 – 33 34 – 34 35 – 35 36 – 36 37 – 38 39 – 39 40 – 41 42 – 44 45 – 45 46 – 47 48 – 48 49 – 49 50 – 51 52 – 53 54 – 54 55 – 55 56 – 57 58 – 58 59 – 59 60 – 60

İngilizce Yunanca

33 And betwene hem stont a symulacre of gold, not lyk the othere symulacres in no kynde, that hath no propre schap but bereth the qualitees of the other goddes. And the Assuriens hem selve clepen it Tokene, for thei han not goven him no propre name; in sothe thei mowe not seyn whens it cam ne what maner thyng it is. But some beleven, it is of Bachus, ~ and othere that it is of Deucalioun, and othere that it is of Semiramys. And for sothe a dowve of gold stont on his hede, and so thei devisen that it is Semiramys Tokene. And it doth iorney twyes eech yeer to the See, for to fecchen that water aforseyde.It is clear from the passage in Melito quoted above that Lucian’s “token” (semeion) rests upon a misunderstanding of the name of a goddess, Simi, Simia, Semea (Néldeke; cf. Hoefer, s.v. Semea in Roscher). The name also figures in the Semiramis-Derceto myth, for the royal overseer is called Simmas. Note also that the figure has a dove on its head. A Talmudic gloss cited by Drusius says: ‘“Samaritanus circumcidit in nomine imaginis columbam referentis quam inventam in vertice montis Garizim certo quodam ritu colunt” (Selden, de Dis Syris, p. 275). See Montgomery, Samaritans, p. 320.