Ἐγχειρίδιον

Sections

1 – 1 1 – 1 2 – 2 3 – 4 5 – 6 7 – 9 10 – 11 12 – 12 13 – 13 14 – 14 15 – 15 16 – 16 17 – 19 20 – 22 23 – 23 24 – 24 25 – 25 26 – 26 27 – 28 29 – 29 30 – 30 31 – 31 32 – 32 33 – 33 33 – 33 33 – 33 33 – 33 34 – 35 36 – 38 39 – 40 41 – 43 44 – 45 46 – 46 47 – 47 48 – 48 49 – 50 51 – 51 52 – 52 53 – 53

İngilizce İngilizce Yunanca

27 As a mark is not set up for the purpose of missing the aim, so neither does the nature of evil exist in the world.This passage is explained in the commentary of Simplicius, (xxxiv., in Schweig.’s ed. xxvii. p. 264), and Schweighaeuser agrees with the explanation, which is this: Nothing in the world (universe) can exist or be done (happen) which in its proper sense, in itself and in its nature is bad; for every thing is and is done by the wisdom and will of God and for the purpose which he intended: but to miss a mark is to fail in an intention; and as a man does not set up a mark, or does not form a purpose for the purpose of missing the mark or the purpose, so it is absurd (inconsistent) to say that God has a purpose or design, and that he purposed or designed anything which in itself and in its nature is bad. The commentary of Simplicius is worth reading. But how many will read it? Perhaps one in a million.

28 If any person was intending to put your body in the power of any man whom you fell in with on the way, you would be vexed: but that you put your understanding in the power of any man whom you meet, so that if he should revile you, it is disturbed and troubled, are you not ashamed at this?