Περὶ ποιητικῆς

Sections

1 – 1 2 – 3 4 – 7 8 – 11 12 – 14 1 – 4 5 – 3 4 – 5 6 – 6 7 – 9 10 – 13 14 – 16 17 – 20 21 – 3 4 – 11 1 – 6 7 – 11 12 – 16 17 – 23 24 – 27 28 – 8 9 – 12 1 – 3 4 – 3 4 – 6 7 – 9 10 – 11b 11c – 3 4 – 1 2 – 5 6 – 8 9 – 9 10 – 4 5 – 6 7 – 11 12 – 3 4 – 8 9 – 15 16 – 19 20 – 5 6 – 10 10b – 10c 10d – 11 12 – 3 4 – 6 7 – 8 9 – 9 10 – 12 1 – 2 3 – 5 6 – 8 9 – 3 4 – 8 9 – 19 20 – 5 6 – 9 1 – 4 5 – 9 10 – 2 3 – 9 10 – 13 14 – 19 20 – 4 5 – 8 9 – 12 13 – 15 16 – 2 3 – 5 6 – 2 3 – 6 7 – 12 13 – 15 16 – 17 18 – 19 20 – 22 23 – 3 4 – 9 10 – 14 15 – 15 16 – 16 17 – 17 18 – 19 20 – 21 22 – 24 25 – 30 31 – 1 2 – 5 6 – 12 13 – 16

ARA İngilizce Latince Latince

1 Since living personsLiterally men doing or experiencing something. are the objects of representation, these must necessarily be either good men or inferior—thus only are characters normally distinguished, since ethical differences depend upon vice and virtue—that is to say either better than ourselves or worse or much what we are. It is the same with painters.

2 Polygnotus depicted men as better than they are and Pauson worse, while Dionysius made likenesses.Polygnotus’s portraits were in the grand style and yet expressive of character(cf. Aristot. Poet. 6.15): Aristophanes aIludes to a Pauson as a perfectly wicked caricaturist: Dionysius of Colophon earned the name of the man-painter because he always painted men and presumably made good likenesses.

3 Clearly each of the above mentioned arts will admit of these distinctions, and they will differ in representing objects which differ from each other in the way here described.

4 In painting too, and flute-playing and harp-playing, these diversities may certainly be found, and it is the same in prose and in unaccompanied verse.