Φίληβος

Bölümler

11 11–12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16–17 17 17–18 18 18–19 19 19 20 20–21 21 22 22–23 23 23–24 24 24–25 25–26 26 26–27 27 27–28 28 29 29–30 30 30–31 31 32 32–33 33 33–34 34 34–35 35 36 36–37 37 37–38 38 38–39 39–40 40 40–41 41 42 42–43 43 43–44 44–45 45 45–46 46 46–47 47–48 48 48–49 49 49–50 50–51 51 51 52 52–53 53 53–54 54–55 55 55–56 56–57 57 57–58 58 59 59–60 60 60–61 61 62 62–63 63 64 64–65 65 65–66 66–67 67

İngilizce Yunanca

24

Socrates

Soc. Always, then, the argument shows that these two have no end; and being endless, they are of course infinite.

Protarchus

Pro. Most emphatically, Socrates.

Socrates

Soc. I am glad you responded, my dear Protarchus, and reminded me that the word emphatically which you have just used, and the word gently have the same force as more and less. For wherever they are present, they do not allow any definite quantity to exist; they always introduce in every instance a comparison—more emphatic than that which is quieter, or vice versa—and thus they create the relation of more and less, thereby doing away with fixed quantity. For, as I said just now, if they did not abolish quantity, but allowed it and measure to make their appearance in the abode of the more and less, the emphatically and gently, those latter would be banished from their own proper place. When once they had accepted definite quantity, they would no longer be hotter or colder; for hotter and colder are always progressing and never stationary; but quantity is at rest and does not progress. By this reasoning hotter and its opposite are shown to be infinite.

Protarchus

Pro. That appears to be the case, Socrates; but, as you said, these subjects are not easy to follow. Perhaps, however, continued repetition might lead to a satisfactory agreement between the questioner and him who is questioned. 10