Σοφιστής

Bölümler

216 216–217 217 217–218 218–219 219 219–220 220 220–221 221 221–222 222 222–223 223 224 224–225 225 225–226 226 226–227 227 227–228 228 228–229 229–230 230 230 230–231 231 232 232–233 233 233–234 234 234–235 235 236 236–237 237 237–238 238 238–239 239–240 240 240–241 241 241–242 242 243 243 243–244 244 244–245 245 245–246 246 246–247 247 247–248 248 248–249 249 249–250 250 250–251 251 251–252 252 252 253 253–254 254 254 255 255–256 256 256–257 257 257 258 258 259 259 259–260 260 260–261 261 261–262 262 262–263 263 263–264 264 264–265 265 266 266 266–267 267 267–268 268

İngilizce Yunanca

243–244

Stranger

Str. You have caught my meaning at once, Theaetetus. For I certainly do mean that this is the best method for us to use, by questioning them directly, as if they were present in person; so here goes: Come now, all you who say that hot and cold or any two such principles are the universe, what is this that you attribute to both of them when you say that both and each are? What are we to understand by this being (or are) of yours? Is this a third principle besides those two others, and shall we suppose that the universe is three, and not two any longer, according to your doctrine? For surely when you call one only of the two being you do not mean that both of them equally are; for in both cases In both cases, i.e. whether you say that one only is or that both are, they would both be one, namely being. they would pretty certainly be one and not two.

Theaetetus

Theaet. True.

Stranger

Str. Well, then, do you wish to call both of them together being? 15

Theaetetus

Theaet. Perhaps.

Stranger

Str. But, friends, we will say, even in that way you would very clearly be saying that the two are one.

Theaetetus

Theaet. You are perfectly right.