Θεαίτητος

Bölümler

142 142–143 143 144 144–145 145 145–146 146 146–147 147 147 147–148 148 149 149–150 150 150 151 151–152 152 152–153 153 153 154 154 154–155 155 155–156 156 156 157 157 157–158 158 158–159 159 159–160 160 160 161 161 161 162 162–163 163 163–164 164 164–165 165 165 166 167 168 168–169 169 169–170 170 170–171 171 171 172 172 172 173 173 174 174 175 175 176 176 176–177 177 177–178 178 178–179 179 179 180 180 180 181 181 181–182 182 182–183 183 184 184 184–185 185 185–186 186 186–187 187 187–188 188 188–189 189 189–190 190 190–191 191 191 192 192–193 193 193 193–194 194 194–195 195 196 196 197 197–198 198 198–199 199 199–200 200 200–201 201 201 202 202 203 203–204 204 204–205 205 205–206 206 206–207 207 207–208 208 208–209 209 209–210 210 210

İngilizce Yunanca

198–199

Socrates

SOC. Continuing, then, our comparison with the acquisition and hunting of the pigeons, we shall say that the hunting is of two kinds, one before the acquisition for the sake of possessing, the other carried on by the possessor for the sake of taking and holding in his hands what he had acquired long before. And just so when a man long since by learning came to possess knowledge of certain things, and knew them, he may have these very things afresh by taking up again the knowledge of each of them separately and holding it—the knowledge which he had acquired long before, but had not at hand in his mind?

Theaetetus

THEAET. That is true.

Socrates

SOC. This, then, was my question just now: How should we express ourselves in speaking about them when an arithmetician undertakes to count or a man of letters to read something? In such a case shall we say that although he knows he sets himself to learn again from himself that which he knows?

Theaetetus

THEAET. But that is extraordinary, Socrates. 20

Socrates

SOC. But shall we say that he is going to read or count that which he does not know, when we have granted that he knows all letters and all numbers?

Theaetetus

THEAET. But that too is absurd.