Pro A. Cluentio

Sections

– 1 – 2 3 – 3 4 – 4 5 – 5 6 – 6 7 – 7 8 – 8 9 – 9 10 – 10 11 – 11 12 – 12 13 – 13 14 – 14 15 – 16 17 – 17 18 – 18 19 – 20 21 – 21 22 – 22 23 – 24 25 – 25 26 – 27 28 – 28 29 – 29 30 – 30 31 – 31 32 – 33 34 – 35 36 – 36 37 – 37 38 – 38 39 – 39 40 – 40 41 – 41 42 – 42 43 – 43 44 – 45 46 – 46 47 – 47 48 – 48 49 – 49 50 – 50 51 – 51 52 – 52 53 – 53 54 – 54 55 – 55 56 – 56 57 – 57 58 – 58 59 – 59 60 – 60 61 – 61 62 – 62 63 – 63 64 – 64 65 – 65 66 – 66 67 – 67 68 – 68 69 – 69 70 – 70 71 – 71 72 – 72 73 – 73 74 – 74 75 – 75 76 – 76 77 – 77 78 – 78 79 – 79 80 – 80 81 – 81 82 – 82 83 – 83 84 – 84 85 – 86 87 – 87 88 – 88 89 – 89 90 – 90 91 – 91 92 – 92 93 – 93 94 – 94 95 – 95 96 – 96 97 – 97 98 – 98 99 – 100 101 – 101 102 – 102 103 – 103 104 – 104 105 – 105 106 – 106 107 – 107 108 – 108 109 – 109 110 – 110 111 – 111 112 – 112 113 – 113 114 – 114 115 – 115 116 – 116 117 – 117 118 – 118 119 – 119 120 – 120 121 – 121 122 – 122 123 – 123 124 – 124 125 – 125 126 – 126 127 – 127 128 – 128 129 – 129 130 – 130 131 – 131 132 – 132 133 – 133 134 – 134 135 – 135 136 – 136 137 – 137 138 – 138 139 – 139 140 – 140 141 – 141 142 – 142 143 – 143 144 – 144 145 – 145 146 – 146 147 – 147 148 – 148 149 – 149 150 – 150 151 – 151 152 – 152 153 – 153 154 – 154 155 – 155 156 – 156 157 – 157 158 – 158 159 – 159 160 – 160 161 – 161 162 – 162 163 – 163 164 – 164 165 – 166 167 – 167 168 – 168 169 – 169 170 – 170 171 – 171 172 – 173 174 – 174 175 – 175 176 – 176 177 – 177 178 – 178 179 – 179 180 – 180 181 – 181 182 – 182 183 – 183 184 – 184 185 – 185 186 – 186 187 – 187 188 – 188 189 – 189 190 – 190 191 – 191 192 – 192 193 – 194 195 – 195 196 – 196 197 – 197 198 – 198 199 – 199 200 – 200 201 – 201 202 – 202

İngilizce Latince

125 But as long as it is plain that Oppianicus was a man who was convicted of having tampered with the public registers of his own municipality, of having made erasures in a will, of having substituted another person in order to accomplish the forgery of a will, of having murdered the man whose name he had put to the will, of having thrown into slavery and into prison the uncle of his own son and then murdered him, of having contrived to get his own fellow-citizens proscribed and murdered, of having married the wife of the man whom he had murdered, of having given money for poisoning, of having murdered his mother-in-law and his wife, of having murdered at one time his brother's wife, the children who were expected, and his own brother himself,—lastly, of having murdered his own children; as he was a man who was manifestly detected in procuring poison for his son-in-law,—who, when his assistants and accomplices had been condemned, and when he himself was prosecuted, gave money to one of the judges to influence by bribes the votes of the other judges;—while, I say, all this is notorious about Oppianicus, and while the accusation of bribery against Cluentius is not sustained by any one single proof, what reason is there that that sentence of the censors, whether it is to be called their wish or their opinion, should either seem to be any assistance to you, or to be able to overwhelm my innocent client?