Περὶ τῶν μυστηρίων

Sections

1 – 2 3 – 4 5 – 6 7 – 7 8 – 8 9 – 10 11 – 11 12 – 12 13 – 13 14 – 14 15 – 16 17 – 17 18 – 19 20 – 21 22 – 23 24 – 25 26 – 26 27 – 27 28 – 29 29 – 29 30 – 30 31 – 32 33 – 33 34 – 35 36 – 36 37 – 37 38 – 38 39 – 40 41 – 42 43 – 44 45 – 45 46 – 47 47 – 47 47 – 50 51 – 52 53 – 55 56 – 57 58 – 59 60 – 62 63 – 64 65 – 66 67 – 67 68 – 70 70 – 72 73 – 73 73 – 73 74 – 74 75 – 76 76 – 76 77 – 77 78 – 78 79 – 79 80 – 81 82 – 82 83 – 85 86 – 87 88 – 89 90 – 91 92 – 93 94 – 94 95 – 96 96 – 96 97 – 97 98 – 99 100 – 100 101 – 101 102 – 103 104 – 105 106 – 106 107 – 108 109 – 110 111 – 111 112 – 113 114 – 115 116 – 116 117 – 118 119 – 120 121 – 124 124 – 125 126 – 128 128 – 130 131 – 131 132 – 132 133 – 134 135 – 136 137 – 138 139 – 140 141 – 143 144 – 145 146 – 147 148 – 150 150 – 150

Yunanca Yunanca

14 This was the first information, gentlemen; it was due to Andromachus, and implicated the persons mentioned. Now call Diognetus, please. WitnessYou were on the commission of inquiry,An extraordinary board of the ζητηταί was set up to investigate both the profanation of the Mysteries and the mutilaton of the Hermae; they would act as an advisory committee to the βουλή. Peisander and Charicles were also members (Andoc. 1.36). Diognetus when Pythonicus impeached Alcibiades before the Assembly? Yes. You recollect that Andromachus laid an information as to what was going on in Pulytion’s house? Yes. And these are the names of those implicated by that information? Yes.