κατὰ Νεαίρας

Sections

1 – 2 3 – 3 4 – 5 6 – 7 8 – 9 10 – 11 12 – 13 14 – 16 16 – 17 18 – 20 21 – 23 23 – 25 25 – 27 28 – 29 30 – 31 32 – 32 33 – 34 34 – 35 36 – 36 37 – 38 39 – 40 40 – 42 43 – 44 45 – 46 47 – 48 48 – 49 50 – 51 52 – 52 53 – 54 55 – 57 58 – 59 60 – 61 62 – 63 64 – 65 66 – 66 67 – 68 69 – 70 71 – 71 72 – 72 73 – 74 74 – 75 76 – 76 77 – 78 79 – 80 81 – 82 83 – 84 85 – 85 86 – 87 88 – 89 90 – 92 92 – 93 94 – 95 96 – 96 97 – 97 98 – 99 100 – 101 102 – 103 104 – 104 105 – 105 106 – 107 108 – 108 109 – 109 110 – 111 112 – 113 114 – 115 116 – 116 117 – 118 119 – 121 122 – 123 123 – 124 124 – 124 125 – 126

İngilizce Yunanca

67 It was in accordance with this law that Epaenetus indicted Stephanus. He admitted having intercourse with the woman, but denied that he was an adulterer; for, he said, she was not the daughter of Stephanus, but of Neaera, and the mother knew that the girl was having intercourse with him, and he had spent large sums of money upon them, and whenever he came to Athens he supported the entire household. In addition to this he brought forward the law which does not permit one to be taken as an adulterer who has to do with women who sit professionally in a brothel or who openly offer themselves for hire; for this, he said, is what the house of Stephanus is, a house of prostitution; this is their trade, and they get their living chiefly by this means.

68 When Epaenetus had made these statements and had preferred the indictment, this Stephanus, knowing that he would be convicted of keeping a brothel and extorting blackmail, submitted his dispute with Epaenetus for arbitration to the very men who were the latter’s sureties on the terms that they should be released from their engagement and that Epaenetus should withdraw the indictment.