ἔνδειξις κατὰ Θεοκρίνου

Sections

1 – 2 3 – 4 5 – 6 6 – 9 9 – 11 12 – 13 14 – 15 16 – 18 18 – 19 20 – 21 22 – 22 23 – 24 25 – 26 27 – 27 28 – 29 30 – 30 31 – 31 32 – 33 34 – 35 35 – 36 37 – 37 38 – 39 40 – 41 42 – 42 43 – 43 44 – 45 46 – 47 48 – 49 50 – 51 52 – 53 54 – 55 56 – 57 58 – 59 60 – 61 62 – 63 64 – 65 66 – 68 68 – 70

İngilizce Yunanca

37 Whether the decrees stand as they are, men of the jury, or are annulled (for it makes no difference to me), what does the state either gain or lose? Nothing, in my opinion. They say that the men of AenosAenos, a town on the south coast of Thrace. pay no heed to our state, and that this has come about because of this fellow Theocrines. For being harassed by the false and malicious charges of this man at the time when some of them were turning to Philip and others to Athens, and learning that the decree which Charinus had previously indicted had again been indicted as illegal,—the decree, that is, which Thucydides proposed and which had to do with their contributionIt appears that the Athenian general Chares had fixed the tribute to be paid by the Athenians at a moderate sum, and that Thucydides had proposed a decree approving this act. This decree was indicted as illegal, first by Charinus and then by Theocrines. The result was that the Aenians revolted and went over to the side of Philip.; and learning furthermore that no conclusion was being reached in the matter,