κατὰ Ἀριστοκράτους

Sections

1 – 3 4 – 5 6 – 8 9 – 11 12 – 14 15 – 16 17 – 18 19 – 20 21 – 23 24 – 25 26 – 28 28 – 30 31 – 33 34 – 35 36 – 37 38 – 39 40 – 41 42 – 44 44 – 46 47 – 49 50 – 51 51 – 53 53 – 54 55 – 56 57 – 58 59 – 60 61 – 62 62 – 62 63 – 63 64 – 65 66 – 67 68 – 69 70 – 71 72 – 73 74 – 74 75 – 75 76 – 77 78 – 79 80 – 81 82 – 83 84 – 86 86 – 87 88 – 89 90 – 92 93 – 94 95 – 96 97 – 99 100 – 102 103 – 104 105 – 106 107 – 108 109 – 110 111 – 113 114 – 115 116 – 117 118 – 119 120 – 121 122 – 123 124 – 125 126 – 127 128 – 129 130 – 132 133 – 135 136 – 138 139 – 140 141 – 141 142 – 142 143 – 144 145 – 147 148 – 149 150 – 151 152 – 153 154 – 155 156 – 157 158 – 159 160 – 162 162 – 163 164 – 165 166 – 168 168 – 169 170 – 171 172 – 174 174 – 176 177 – 178 179 – 181 182 – 183 184 – 185 186 – 187 188 – 190 191 – 192 193 – 194 195 – 196 197 – 198 199 – 200 201 – 202 203 – 204 205 – 206 207 – 208 209 – 209 210 – 211 212 – 214 215 – 216 217 – 218 219 – 220

İngilizce Yunanca

21 And when I inquire whether or not the enactment of this decree is conducive to the public good, dismiss everything else and watch my reasoning on that point,—is it sound or unsound? Listen to me in that manner, and you will get a better understanding of what you ought to know, by looking at one question at a time, instead of inquiring into all the issues at once, while I shall have no difficulty in explaining what I mean. On every topic my remarks shall be brief.

22 Now take and read the actual statutes, that I may prove thereby the illegality of their proposal.

22 One of the Statutes of the Areopagus Concerning Homicide

22 The Council of the Areopagus shall take cognizance in cases of homicide, of intentional wounding, of arson, and of poisoning, if a man kill another by giving poison.

23 Stop there. You have heard the statute, men of Athens, and you have also heard the decree. Let me tell you how you will more readily grasp the arguments on the question of illegality. Consider the status of the person in whose favour the decree has been proposed: is he an alien, a resident alien, or a citizen? If we call him a resident alien, we shall not be telling the truth; and if we call him an alien, we shall be doing him wrong, for it is only fair to him to admit the validity of that grace of the people by which he was made a citizen. It seems, then, that we must treat him as a citizen in our arguments.

← Previous 9 / 104 Next →

Şifre Yenileme