ὑπὲρ Κτησιφῶντος περὶ τοῦ στεφάνου

Sections

1 – 3 4 – 6 7 – 9 10 – 11 12 – 13 14 – 16 17 – 18 19 – 20 21 – 22 23 – 24 25 – 26 27 – 29 29 – 30 31 – 33 34 – 36 37 – 39 39 – 40 41 – 42 43 – 44 45 – 46 47 – 48 49 – 51 52 – 54 54 – 55 56 – 58 59 – 61 62 – 64 65 – 66 67 – 69 70 – 71 72 – 73 74 – 75 75 – 77 77 – 78 79 – 81 82 – 84 84 – 85 86 – 88 89 – 90 91 – 92 92 – 93 94 – 95 96 – 97 98 – 99 100 – 101 102 – 103 104 – 105 106 – 107 108 – 110 111 – 112 113 – 114 115 – 116 117 – 118 118 – 119 120 – 120 121 – 122 123 – 125 126 – 127 128 – 128 129 – 129 130 – 131 132 – 135 135 – 136 137 – 138 139 – 139 140 – 141 142 – 144 145 – 147 148 – 149 150 – 151 152 – 154 155 – 157 157 – 158 159 – 161 162 – 164 164 – 164 165 – 166 166 – 167 168 – 168 169 – 169 170 – 171 172 – 174 175 – 176 177 – 177 178 – 179 180 – 181 182 – 184 185 – 186 187 – 189 190 – 191 192 – 194 195 – 196 197 – 198 199 – 201 202 – 203 204 – 205 206 – 208 209 – 211 211 – 212 213 – 214 215 – 216 217 – 218 219 – 221 222 – 224 225 – 228 229 – 230 231 – 232 233 – 234 235 – 237 238 – 239 240 – 242 243 – 244 245 – 246 247 – 248 249 – 250 251 – 253 254 – 256 257 – 258 259 – 260 261 – 262 263 – 265 266 – 268 269 – 271 272 – 274 275 – 276 277 – 278 279 – 281 282 – 283 284 – 285 286 – 287 288 – 289 290 – 292 293 – 294 295 – 296 297 – 298 299 – 301 302 – 304 305 – 307 308 – 309 310 – 311 312 – 313 314 – 316 317 – 319 320 – 321 322 – 323 324 – 324

İngilizce Yunanca

222 To these straits had my policy, Aeschines, reduced Philip: and such was then the language uttered by a man who had hitherto lifted his voice vauntingly against Athens. And for that reason I was deservedly decorated by the citizens. You were present, but said nothing in opposition; and Diondas, who arraigned the grant, did not get the fifth part of the votes. Please read the decrees which were then by that acquittal validated, and which Aeschines never even arraigned.

222 (The Decrees are read)

223 These decrees, men of Athens, exhibit the same wording and phrasing as those proposed formerly by Aristonicus, and now by Ctesiphon. Aeschines did not prosecute them himself, nor did he support the accusation of the man who did arraign them. And yet if there is any truth in his present denunciation, he might then have prosecuted Demomeles, the proposer, and Hypereides, with more reason than Ctesiphon,

224 who can refer to these precedents, to the decision of the courts, to the observation that Aeschines himself did not prosecute persons who made the same proposals, to the statutory prohibition of repeated prosecution in such cases, and so forth; whereas at that time the issue would have been tried on its merits without such presumptions.