Catilina

Sections

intro – intro intro – intro intro – intro intro – intro intro – intro intro – intro intro – intro intro – intro intro – intro intro – intro intro – intro intro – intro intro – intro intro – intro intro – intro 1 – 1 1 – 1 1 – 1 2 – 2 2 – 2 2 – 2 3 – 3 3 – 3 4 – 4 5 – 5 5 – 5 5 – 5 6 – 6 6 – 6 7 – 7 8 – 8 8 – 9 9 – 9 10 – 10 11 – 11 11 – 11 12 – 12 12 – 12 13 – 13 13 – 13 14 – 14 15 – 15 16 – 16 16 – 16 17 – 17 17 – 17 18 – 18 18 – 18 19 – 20 20 – 20 20 – 20 20 – 20 20 – 20 21 – 21 22 – 22 23 – 23 24 – 24 25 – 25 26 – 26 26 – 26 27 – 27 28 – 28 29 – 29 30 – 30 31 – 31 31 – 31 31 – 31 32 – 32 33 – 33 33 – 33 33 – 34 34 – 34 34 – 34 36 – 36 36 – 36 37 – 37 37 – 37 37 – 37 38 – 38 39 – 39 39 – 39 40 – 40 41 – 41 42 – 42 43 – 43 43 – 43 43 – 44 44 – 44 45 – 45 46 – 46 47 – 47 47 – 47 48 – 48 48 – 48 48 – 48 49 – 49 50 – 50 50 – 50 51 – 51 51 – 51 51 – 51 51 – 51 51 – 51 51 – 51 51 – 51 51 – 51 51 – 51 52 – 52 52 – 52 52 – 52 52 – 52 52 – 52 52 – 52 52 – 52 52 – 52 52 – 52 52 – 52 53 – 53 53 – 53 54 – 54 55 – 55 55 – 55 56 – 56 56 – 56 56 – 56 56 – 56 56 – 58 58 – 58 58 – 58 59 – 59 59 – 59 60 – 60 60 – 60 61 – 61 chronology – chronology chronology – chronology chronology – chronology chronology – chronology

İngilizce Latince Latince

intro Of the numerous editions of Sallust, that of Cortius, which appeared at Leipsic in 1724, and has been often reprinted, long indisputably held the first rank. But Cortius, as an editor, was somewhat too fond of expelling from his text all words that he could possibly pronounce superfluous; and succeeding editors, as Gerlach (Basil. 1823), Kritz (Leipsic, 1834), and Dietsch (Leipsic, 1846), have judiciously restored many words that he had discarded, and produced texts more acceptable in many respects to the generality of students.

intro Sallust has been many times translated into English. The versions most deserving notice are those of Gordon (1744), Rose (1751), Murphy (1809), and Peacock (1845.) Gordon has vigor, but wants polish; Rose is close and faithful but often dry and hard; Murphy is sprightly, but verbose and licentious, qualities in which his admirer, Sir Henry Steuart (1806), went audaciously beyond him; Mr. Peacock's translation is equally faithful with that of Rose, and far exceeds it in general ease and agreeableness of style.