Περὶ Ἴσιδος και Ὀσίριδος

Sections

intro – intro intro – intro intro – intro intro – intro 1 – 1 2 – 2 3 – 3 4 – 4 5 – 5 6 – 6 7 – 7 8 – 8 8 – 8 8 – 8 9 – 9 9 – 9 10 – 10 10 – 10 10 – 10 11 – 11 12 – 12 12 – 12 13 – 13 13 – 13 14 – 14 14 – 14 15 – 15 16 – 16 17 – 17 18 – 18 18 – 18 19 – 19 19 – 19 20 – 20 21 – 21 22 – 22 23 – 23 24 – 24 25 – 25 26 – 26 26 – 26 27 – 27 28 – 28 29 – 29 30 – 30 31 – 31 32 – 32 32 – 32 32 – 33 33 – 33 34 – 34 35 – 35 36 – 36 36 – 36 37 – 37 38 – 38 38 – 38 39 – 39 40 – 40 40 – 40 41 – 41 42 – 42 42 – 42 43 – 43 43 – 43 44 – 44 44 – 44 44 – 45 45 – 45 46 – 46 47 – 47 47 – 47 48 – 48 48 – 48 48 – 48 49 – 49 50 – 50 51 – 51 51 – 52 52 – 52 52 – 52 53 – 53 54 – 54 55 – 55 56 – 56 56 – 56 56 – 57 57 – 57 58 – 58 58 – 59 59 – 59 60 – 60 61 – 61 61 – 61 62 – 62 63 – 63 63 – 63 64 – 64 65 – 65 66 – 66 66 – 66 67 – 67 68 – 68 69 – 69 70 – 70 71 – 71 71 – 71 72 – 72 73 – 73 74 – 74 75 – 75 75 – 75 75 – 75 75 – 75 76 – 76 77 – 77 78 – 78 78 – 79 79 – 79 80 – 80 80 – 80

İngilizce İngilizce Yunanca

intro In spite of minor errors contained in the Isis and Osiris, no other work by a Greek writer is more frequently referred to by Egyptologists except, possibly, Herodotus. Connected information may, of course, be found in histories of Egypt, such as those of Breasted and Baikie.All the Greek and Roman sources for the religion of the Egyptians will be found conveniently collected in Hopfner, Fontes Historiae Religionis Aegyptiacae, Parts I. and II. (Bonn, 1922-1923).

intro The work is dedicated to Clea, a cultured and intelligent woman, priestess at Delphi, to whom Plutarch dedicated also his book on the Bravery of Women (Moralia, 242 e - 263 c, contained in vol. iii. of L.C.L. pp. 473-581). It is, no doubt, owing to this that the author, after he has unburdened himself of his information on Egyptology, goes on to make some very sane remarks on the subject of religion and the proper attitude in which to approach it. This part of the essay ranks with the best of Plutarch’s writing. The Ms. tradition of the essay is bad, as may be seen from the variations found in the few passages quoted by later writers such as Eusebius and Stobaeus; yet much has been done by acute scholars to make the text more intelligible. It may not be invidious to mention among those who have made special contributions to the study of this work W. Baxter, who translated it (1684), and S. Squire, who edited it (1744). Many other names will be found in the critical notes.

← Previous 3 / 121 Next →

Şifre Yenileme